TAA i.3.23.31
Page 19 of first draft on shrines, handwritten.
© Griffith Institute,
University of Oxford
extricating those sections we had to employ a similar but
reversed method.
Each member or section had been carefully marked
with joiner’s “guide” marks as well as with the cardinal points.
to show their correct orientation. These marks were either
scratched or painted in black upon the overlay of gold,
to show not only how they fitted together but also their
correct orientation. However, the sections were evidently
introduced contrary to the instructions marked upon them,
and they were erected over the sarcophagus in exact reverse
orientation – namely, the shrines facing towards the east
instead of west – with the result their west fronts were
at the foot of the sarcophagus instead of at the head.
Whether this was due to carelessness on the part of the work-
men who erected them, or whether it was due to some
other specific reason, is difficult to say. But since symbols
engraved upon the walls of the shrines, for example the
[ 𓂀 ] ‘wd3t’-eyes, were not in correct position, and thus they
did not agree in situation with those carved upon the sarcoph-
agus, one suspects that the error lay with the workmen
when introducing the sections: an error possibly discovered
when it was too late to correct it. There was, however, testimony
of direct carelessness: a roof section was put on the wrong
way round (see first shrine, p. ...); sections had been banged
together regardless of risk of damage to their gilded ornamentation;