TAA i.3.23.10
Page 9 of second draft on shrines, handwritten. Alfred Lucas is mentioned on this page.
© Griffith Institute,
University of Oxford
(IX)
type of joint was employed, such as “the square or smooth
joint, in which the edges of the boards to be jointed” were
“planed straight and square to the faces (then probably
with an adze <which took the place of a plane in those days>, and finished with a grit-stone smoother),
after which the edges were glued and rubbed into
close contact; to hold the edges together until the
glue was hard”, clamps of some kind were without[?]
used. (1) But the joint more generally was used for joining
<(1)
See Note upon
glue:- Lucas
The Tomb of Tut.Ankh.Amen,
Appendix II, p.166>
up the material forming the chief beam, the panels
and dado, or other work of a like nature, was the
rebated glued joint, strengthened with either wooden
dowels, or cross-grained tongues inserted into mortises at
intervals.
The plain mitre joint was only employed in special
cases, such as the extreme angle between the chief
beam over the doorway and the vertical framing of the
doorway.
Practically all the post and panel sections were
held together by means of mortise and tenon joints, – i.e.
“Where the end of a wooden member is cut [parallel to the
grain] to fit into a rectangular hole in a second
member, the joint is called a mortise and tenon joint;
the hole being the mortise and the fitted end [parallel to
the grain], the tenon.” And, it is not without interest to note