TAA i.3.14.10
Typewritten letter to Howard Carter regarding analysis of gold from the tomb, page 2. Includes handwritten notes by Carter drafting a reply. James Ogden is mentioned on this page.
© Griffith Institute,
University of Oxford
(2)
want of descriptive information about the specimens themselves
which you alone can give.
I hope to see you soon and to hear that you are very
well and have had a very successful season.
Kindest regards from Mrs. Scott and from
Yours very truly,
Alexander Scott
Dr. Howard Carter,
2, Princes Gate Court,
S.W.7.
To reply
May 10th 1933
Thank you indeed for the information re the scarlet-gold.
I received <last years> notes upon the subject from Mr Ogden including a
copy of the analysis. But what I have not got into my
stupid head is – was the percentage of iron in the gold
due to it having been intentionally alloyed <with the gold>, or was it due
to <selected> specimens of native ore/<gold> originally containing iron>
especially <used> selected for <x[?]> decorative effect. Naturally, one
recognizes that either condition could meet the case, but
some idex[?]/<a> as to x[?]/<the> probabilities condition would throughsic
much light upon <the extent of> those ancients’ metallurgical knowledge <especially in connection with iron>.
For, as you know, they <xxx[?]> applied the pure[?] yellow gold (yellow[?]
upon the scarlet gold for decorative to obtain a special/<an intentional> decorative
effect: