TAA i.3.2.43

1. Where I have had my MS re-typed, I have 

ticked the/<o>se pencil numbers (on the new 

sheets), which you had ticked on the copies 

that you saw.
2. I return the papers you pinned onto my 

sheets of MS., and have used the in-

formation you gave me, when I thought 

you intended me to do so. Please 

delete any of it from my MS, if it you 

did not intend me to include it.
          Under Zizyphus, have I spelt 

Nabbûkh as you wrote it?
3. I have replaced the word ‘tenon’ by 

‘cross-tongue’ <(under Quercus & Zizyphus woods)>, which I think, from 

your explanation and diagram, is 

correct, rather than dowel. But please 

see pencil note under Cedrus wood.
4. By the thinness of the specimens you 

were able to decide that No 236 splinter, 

239 not gold-faced, and the specimen 

I rec had from Newberry were all cross-

tongues. I was to remind you of this, and 

that you would write a note about the 

Newberry specimen, to go with my notes 

under Quercus Aegilops, or where you 

refer to them.