TAA i.3.23.29.recto
Page 17 of first draft on shrines, handwritten. Alexander Scott is also mentioned on this page.
© Griffith Institute,
University of Oxford
tin 2.5 %, and silver 0.3 %, between[?]/<and/<with>> no evidence of the presence of
lead. The metal was covered with a dark green coating which suggested
that it had been painted (especially in view of the a similar
broad line of the same colour painted around the base of the
stone sarcophagus). From his analysis Dr Scott <also> says: “that it is
probable that this metallic binding was originally painted;
although it can hardly be said that it has been proved.” (1)
The reveals of the frameworks of the doorways – i.e. the chief
beam or over door frieze, the door posts, and sill – were rebated
to receive the folding doors: the inner piece of these rebates was
in many instances planted.
The framing of the doors comprises styles and rails: the upright
side members are termed the hanging and meeting[?] styles;
the horizontal ones, which were tenoned to the styles, are termed
the top and bottom rails. This framing is of the same thickness
as the vertical boards of the doorpanel. The doors were hung by
means of a primitive form of pivot hinge, contrived in the
following manner:- the projecting ends or horns of the
hanging style are rounded off to form a pivot of conic form/<shape>,
and corresponding sockets to receive the pivots are sunk into
the reveals of the chief beam or over door frieze, and sill. In some
cases both the pivots and the sockets were encased with copper.
The butt edges of the doors/<of the hanging styles> were rounded off to enable the doors to
swing freely, and the meeting styles rebated to prevent observation
through the joint.