TAA i.2.1.109
© Griffith Institute,
University of Oxford
Feb. 4.
Removed the four parts of the IVth Shrine (239)
Shew, Bethell, Breasted (who came in the afternoon) and Newberry
the Sarcophagus.
" 6
Took dimensions of the sarcophagus for necessary glass & tackle
to remove the lid. Many visitors came which gave one little
time.
Left for Cairo in the Evening with view of seeing the
Min. of P. W. D (Morkhas Bey Hanna).
" 7.
As arranged with Tottenham the press were allowed to
visit the tomb during the morning.
Arrived Cairo. Saw Gardiner in the morning with whom
I had a long conversation in/<wi>th regard to attitude with this
new Ministry. He assuring me that their attitude
was to be friendly, and to be willing to let by gones
be by gones. He (Gardiner) seemed to have medledsic {meddled}
with the affair rather much, but with obviously good
intention.
As arranged saw Min. P. W. D. at 5 pm at the
P. W. D. On arrival I was told that the Min. was late
and that I should have to wait some twenty minutes.
While so doing I was called to go and see Tottenham
at his office, when Tottenham advised me to only
ne raised/<e> the question of the opening of the Sarcophagus with the
Minister - in fact he said it would be better if all former negotiations
&/<c>ould be forgotten & papers destroyed. Tottenham, then ha having
thus somewhat disarmed me, suddenly thrust upon me a document
which his ministry considered threw light upon the question of
division of the discovery. This document was no less than a
permit given to Lord C. to make an investigation in the Great Northern
Valley (8. Dec. 1918) where I thought I had made a possible discovery.
At first I did not recognise it, but when Tottenham pointed out
that it was signed by me & I began to read it carefully
the whole subject came clear to my memory & I at once
explained to him that it had nothing to do with the Valley
of the Kings Contract. We then proceeded to the office of the
Min. P. W. D.
There, with Tottenham, I met the new Minister, Mer/<a>khas {Makhas} Bey Hanna,
who appeared to be most gracious, and who almost immediately
complained that I had sent Gardiner to him with complaint <against the S. des A.>.
This I explained was a mistake and that I believed Gardiner l[?]
gone to him on a matter/<as representative> of his colleagues with regard to their
feelings in the question of action on part of the S. des A., and that
it was nothing to do with me. The Min. then ask[ed] me if I was
'in accord' with the Service of Antiquities and I told him that
I was not 'in accord' with their methods of administration
but that personally <other than that> my feelings were quite different. He said
or rather asked me that I had any grievances would I write
him on the matter. I answered in the affirmative. The Min.
said that <I> thought possibly I <had thought> might be legally within my Rights.